You almost got your wish, had planned to finish up 10900K build and build a 5950X system today, got both system completed, unfortunately the 5950X has a weird fault where in goes into a halt state at random and then recovers, so 5950X benchmarks will have a wait a day out two while diagnose and solve issue.
But here are the i9 10900K scores, stock other than multicore enhancement enabled, 32GB DDR4-3600, it was under an air cooler due to 4U chassis limitation, so not ideal, but it never really got hot due to the short amount of time each ROM takes to benchmark.
ROM i7 6700K R7 5800X i9 10900K
blitz 260 326 308 crusnusa 315 372 423 cubeqst 360 465 427 cyvern 1216 1388 1402 dkong 4377 5182 5377 drivedge 350 434 436 gauntleg 488 500 484 gnbarich 2034 2327 2409 gradius4 374 461 gtfore06 211 238 harddriv 682 823 799 kidniki 461 583 554 kof98 1322 1725 1582 mario 1091 1270 1322 mk4 273 318 359 pacman 12153 14678 14967 pinkswts 1669 2326 2152 pongf 504 589 641 propcycl 284 372 343 radikalb 251 317 341 roadblst 1202 1495 1412 robotron 6426 7146 7749 rvschool 342 429 395 scud 81 115 98 sf2 2644 3450 3128 sfa2 1834 2290 2200 sfiii 1382 1753 1387 slrasslt 549 1167 814 spacfury 188 237 212 starblad 193 227 235 starsldr 68 74 82 sushibar 88 114 104 tekken 588 631 704 tekken3 249 318 346 vf2 173 231 214 vfkids 141 178 167
I not sure how well the 5950X will do due to the two separate chiplets, I tried benchmark the R9 3950X last year and the Windows scheduler kept bouncing MAME from core to core like a hot potato, and MAME really didn't like the 4 separate CCXes with separate caches, was actually faster with 3 out of 4 CCXes disabled.
If all else fails, Burn the manual.
|