> I said that of RA users, because yes, it's a problem. The people still using MAME I'm
> not saying that about. I consider who have moved to RA for these reasons a lost cause
> anyway, actually I'm thankful a lot of them have moved on because their toxicity has
> not been missed. The problem is it's infectious.
>
> You instead are throwing direct insults at me.
No, you see, you automatically mingle together people who raise the issues with the retroarch toxic bunch.
Because every time something like input delay of whatever issue that'd make users like MAME more comes in the discussion, you invoke RETROARCH! (so convenient heh?)
You won't consider some of them are indeed idiots, but some went to RetroArch because they have nothing the likes of the features we've discussed available in legit MAME, and you don't even want to consider they would be happy to come back to MAME if you offered something. Like you've dodged discussing the part aout BGFX and frame queue.
It's that problem, every time: RetroArch catches people because they offer some features MAME doesn't have, you refuse to admit the other side of the issue is that MAME doesn't have anything alike.
It's your blatantly dishonest evasive and moving goalposts attitude that is insulting, and your playing the hurt crybaby is hilarious, that doesn't work to mask your pitiful attemps at escaping the embarrassing topics.
And with that good night, for good. Also good night MAME, you were loved, but the fools will ruin you. *sob*
> MAME isn't about playing the games anyway.
|
Index 
Flat 
Re: HLSL changes by anikom15
Reply
