> And now there is a Rerez "Hot Take" on this too.
I think somebody is going around drumming up publicity for this, because it's literally one of the least interesting things to happen in the last 5 or 6 years, there's practically no reason to be giving it coverage. Most of the places covering it act like MAME hasn't really done anything for the last 15 tho.
The cynical side of me says that some people probably just want their name in active news coverage, there no such thing as bad publicity etc.
Index 
Flat 
Re: Ars Technica article
Reply
