> > > However I will continue to use 5.3 for 32-bit builds, for XP compatibility.
> >
> > Shipping known broken builds to keep what must be a tiny minority of users still
> > holding on to an 18 year old OS happy?
> >
> > I mean I'm kinda surprised it's broken, but that actually makes it more likely a
> lot
> > more is broken too since unexpected breakage is rarely this isolated, and the
> problem
> > is only going to get worse.
> >
> > Might be just better to accept that XP support is dead.
>
> You are mistaken. 32-bit build was never broken.
Ah, that's alright then, any compiler that produces bad / broken code for no obvious reason should be ditched as soon as possible tho, so not using the broken 64-bit one is definitely a good move.
5.3 isn't going to compile MAME forever tho, so the XP problem is probably going to come up again sooner rather than later I feel.
|
Previous 
Index 
Next 
Flat 
Re: Caveman
Reply
Re: Caveman
