> > I'm not sure where your "stupid section of the constitution" information came from,
> > but it's wrong.
>
> Article II. Wherever "shall" is used, there is no way around it. That's why he gets a
> check, then donates it. He can't simply refuse his check.
Not arguing any of that, was I? This is the part you got wrong:
> He donates all of it back, except for $1 that he has to take because of some stupid
> section of the constitution.
There's nothing about "$1" in Article II, is there?
|
Index 
Flat 
Re: Native American drum guy situation
Reply
