> I guess it's better than what the European countries have been forced to take in. I'm
> not aware of any South American religions that allows killing infidels, or plowing
> through a crowd in a truck or lorry (for you old Basts out there). There's also the
> grooming gangs (sex slavery) thing going on. But, I highly doubt we'll have to endure
> that either.
>
>
> As for the whole racist idea... I thought to myself; what if was a caravan of French
> Canadians fleeing... I dunno what, or for what reason, but just shoehorning in a
> hypothetical scenario here. Would it still be wrong for them to just come in?
> Legally, yes. So that destroys the whole "racist" fallacy.
What the fuck are you talking about?
> I wonder what other factors might be in play as a negative aspect for that many
> people being foisted onto the public at once?
Foisted onto the public? Yes Tom there would be horror galore since they are people searching for jobs so they'll be working their asses off in a field or factory so you can buy inexpensive stuff. It's gonna ruin your life.
> I did have to laugh at the idea of going ahead and accepting those that are seeking
> asylum. Apparently they've never seen the movie Spartacus.
Of course you'd laugh at the idea of being kind to other humans, because you're a complete asshole. Fucking Spartacus lol. You're under siege Tom!
|
Index 
Flat 
Re: Pentagon rejected request for troops to act as emergency law enforcement at border
Reply
