|
|
Re: I may get flamed for this, but this IS the loony bin so... (Retroarch Bounty)
10/08/18 05:37 PM
|
|
|
> Easy, yet that pocket money bounty shows a pathetic side of their project. Did MAME
> ever buy development?
No, we've tended to discourage it as for the most part it results in rushed solutions that meet the criteria rather than correct ones which suits RAs model to the ground because they only have to consider one system at a time in most cases. This works because they don't care about emulating anything correctly meaning it's often money wasted, not money well spent, unless all you care about is playing a specific game (which unfortunately is a bigger draw than doing things properly, and pulling emulation in the wrong direction) Some of the bounties I've seen are for literally breaking the proper emulation and changing how things work just because somebody prefers that over how it's meant to be.
I took the one for the CPS3 bug because it was originally my driver in the first place and was something I was already looking at and an easy fix, but that's going straight back into investments for MAME (or at least will when I sort out the payment system)
|
|
Index 
Flat 
Re: I may get flamed for this, but this IS the loony bin so... (Retroarch Bounty)
Reply
