> > I have no control over that site. You can't blame me although you will anyway.
> >
> You are thanked for providing the 'exe' every release, which I thought was just bad
> wording, and you were actually providing the full package, if not, that's the fatal
> mistake you've made (again). Either way, since you're providing it directly, and are
> named as the provider, it *is* your responsibility. If you're not providing it
> directly and it's instead being lifted from somewhere else without your permission
> then you need to have words with John IV for stealing your exe, because that is the
> 'official' UI site, and that is what people use and it is not doing the reputation of
> MAMEUI any good at all.
Again, you assume things without checking it out first, then throwing these unstantiated "facts" around, things that I shouldn't have to explain.
1. I build and package MAMEUI with the correct release files, and upload these as 7z files to a primary and a backup site. There is a 32-bit package and a 64-bit package.
2. Anyone who downloads is not "stealing", it's freely offered to the public.
3. I *assume* that John downloads the 64-bit package, extracts the exe and adds it to his own package. But you'll have to ask him. It's nothing to do with me, and I cannot possibly have any control over the process, and the licence prohibits this kind of control, even if I wanted to.
4. So, if you want to blame me, you have to download the package from MY SITE, not anywhere else, check the contents and do testing. If you find something wrong which I can duplicate, then I'll accept it.
5. Blaming me for what others do is not right. It's just like if someone took official MAME and packaged it incorrectly. Will you blame MAMEdev for that? Of course not. That's just being silly.
6. I'm holding on to the possibility of some decency in you, somewhere... and I'm hoping you'll see some sense in what I say. If not, well... I did try.
|
Index 
Flat 
Re: Apparent Direct 3d bug in mame64 202 (non patched)
Reply
