> > > > 192Kb/s AC3 is very lossy indeed > > > > > > Can you successfully ABX 192kB/s AC3 versus lossless? > > > > that's not really the point when you're dealing with preservation > > Wasn't this just supposed to be a WIP - a clip showing progress? Nobody was > mentioning AC3 @ 192kB/s being the "final" audio product, unless I misunderstood > something. > So... get off their backs please. > On the other hand (if I am wrong), I would very much doubt AC3 is transparent at this > rate. See: http://wiki.hydrogenaud.io/index.php?title=Transparency
I don't expect the final thing to be AC3 / MP4, no.
I was just expressing surprise that such formats were being used for the WIP for the very reason that they're not going to be representative of the final thing as the capture quality is one of the big things about these new techniques.
Index 
Flat 
Re: DU: Laserdisc updates and more
Reply
