> This post was copied due to the forum or this browser not always loading a post after
> I've made it, only to have wasted my time. It's a reply to (anonymous) who deleted
> their post before I added the following reply.
Because after I thought about it, I realized no matter what anyone says, you just aren't going to get it, so why bother, and I deleted my own post. Perhaps I'll give it one more try.
> Right. But this was from a white person to a white person. Or, at least, someone that
> doesn't even appear to have any Negroid features.
Thank you for proving my point, and showing that you are utterly clueless. Maybe I shouldn't give it one more try.
Tom >>> "The world is as I observe it. Even if it isn't, I still observed it that way, so that is what it is, facts be damned."
Valerie is black. Her "not appearing to have any Negroid features" (fuck me, did you actually write that?) doesn't change the fact that she's black. Go look up a picture of her daughter Laura while you're at it. (Nevermind... you'll probably just think she's "really tan.")
> I'm going to guess that Roseanne was making the comparison in looks between Valerie
> Jarrett and the 2001 version of Planet of the Apes character Ari. But it's as if it's
> because the word 'Apes' was invoked that it automatically means it's a racist (or, in
> this case, an anti-black) remark. Gotta clutch onto muh racism!
>
> I'd ask if anyone actually thinks Roseanne would have said this if Valerie actually
> did have said features. But the answer will probably be "yes" anyway. Because if the
> MSM said it, then it must be true.
Please... I read it with zero preconceptions when it first happened... first thing I thought was "fuckin' racist piece of shit."
But I guess, since the MSM (is that a buzzword?) agrees with a bunch of individuals who also feel the same way, it must be a conspiracy to bring Roseanne down, not actually racist, right?
Yeah... I should really stop now... I'm just wasting energy.
> Yes. I've seen it. I get what they're "saying". But what everyone seems to have their
> fingers in their ears and saying "La-la-la-la-la-la-la!" about is the fact that
> nothing racist was ever said. And therefor, them saying "we're firing her because she
> said something racist" is horseshit.
*** Tom puts fingers in his own ears ***
"Nothing racist was ever said, because I, Tom, have dutifully concluded that nothing racist was ever said. Because I said so. That's why."
*** Tom continues on "La-la... la-la-la-la-ing" to Smurfs theme, skipping down the street ***
Yup... I'm just feeding the troll by now.
> If they want to fire her just because she said something offensive, then fine. Call
> it what it is. Don't gloss over it with some b.s. buzzword in order to look like
> you're defending black people because she said "apes".
Not like anyone here glosses over stuff here, amiright?
> Once you remove the idea of something racist having been said, then the firing really
> looks like they overreacted. But hey. It's their right to fire whoever the fuck they
> want, for whatever reason they want. God bless the USA.
I really do wish God would bless the USA a little bit right now, because we need it.
-------------------------------------------
You don't believe it was racist. The whole of MAMEWorld could come down here and disagree with you, and you would STILL believe you are right.
So you must be right after all. Sorry for wasting your time. My sincerest apologies.
** runs out of troll snacks **
RELAX and just have fun. Remember, it's all about the games.
|
Index 
Flat 
Re: PC thought police strike again
Reply
