|
Re: southern Ohio's yee haw sheriff on Fox last month
03/17/18 05:11 PM
|
|
|
> > The crazy guy with the gun just factors armed teachers into his plan. Potentially > > Jittery armed teachers are far more of a threat than the occasional madman. > > So what you're saying is that the nervous armed teachers are going to be the ones > killing innocent people?
Yes. Bringing guns to a situation leads to a non-zero chance that they'll be used inappropriately in that situation. Armed teachers will have a gun in the school day-in, day-out. Teachers aren't exactly best and brightest these days, and they can put under a lot of stress having to effectively babysit shitty kids/teenagers. Having more guns in that situation doesn't sound responsible.
> > US has a stupid-high homicide rate for a first-world country. Some self-examination > > is definitely in order. > > If you remove the cities where guns are forbidden, like Chicago, Washington D.C.... > and several others (I won't bother looking up the statistics, maybe later if I feel > like it) then the U.S. gun related crime rate goes way way down. It's not Law Abiding > citizens that are committing these crimes... Who do you suppose is responsible? Could > it be... Criminals who don't give a flying f* about gun laws? Yeah. That sounds about > right.
Yeah, but the same's true of just about any country. If you discount the hotspots in South Africa, the violence goes way down. If you discount the hotspots in Philippines, the violence goes way down. Gun bans are a reaction of the violent hotspots. How about looking at the deeper causes that create the violent hotspots in the first place?
|
|