> No, it just says that you have no clue about this issue. This is just a example here. > The larger the distance to the TV is, the bigger it needs to be, to see a difference > between 2k and 4k.
Man, I appreciate everything you've done for the handheld emulation effort, but I think you're trying to apply a broad principle on something that requires a bit more nuance. ![](//www.mameworld.info/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif)
I have a 50" 1080p TV that I treat as a monitor:
![](https://i.imgur.com/Jydaikbl.jpg)
Yet at 3 meters away, I can still tell that it would take a 4K display to truly go below the threshold where I can see individual pixels.
You really can't give any consistently accurate advice, given how wildly differently peoples' visual acuity is. Maybe my vision is much better than average. I don't know. But it's worth considering regardless.
|