MAMEWorld Forums - Welcome to the War Room

Let's straighten out things so there are no mistakes or misleads.

>So, if by the stipulation of the Chinese (wanting limited US press access),

My first post of the thread was while "you-know-who" was standing before the media while on the ground inside China as a guest. This was not where the APEC summit took place...the APEC summit was in Vietnam.

As mentioned in first post, previous WH spokespersons (Carney, Ari Fleischer etc.) have stated that China's rules with regards to media is to not allow reporters to ask questions. Past US administrations (Clinton, W. Bush, Obama) have insisted that reporters (media) be allowed to ask questions even when Chinese leader is present standing next to US President. Chinese government officials would then back off respecting US First Amendment of the US Constitution and allow reporters to ask questions.

The "illegitimate President" (US Georgia Senator Jon Lewis correctly described) didn't want to answer media questions since he hates US media (except Fox and Breitbart) and gave the excuse of "...have to obey China's laws". That is a cop-out. The sob doesn't want to talk because he knows he will try and say something and look like a dumbshit for what he really is.

The first post is all inside the boundaries of China.

I decided that since the theme is similar to what happened in China, I decided to add what took place in Vietnam...APEC summit and add that within this thread. I shouldn't have, but gambled since the topic/theme was similar even though I mentioned what took place was in two separate countries.

[On to Vietnam and APEC]

> Trump should've only allowed CNN to be with him? Or is there another, specific new org
>he should've picked?

The APEC summit in Vietnam is a World/Asia region issue that involved numerous countries (not just US and 'name-country-being-visited'). It should be open to ALL USA media...not specific preferred media [including propoganda media]. No excuse. The host country Vietnam and APEC summit organizers should have mandated "open to all media access".

>Then again, news orgs like CNN aren't known to ever give any favorable coverage for
>Trump. They can always twist something.

No. When current CNN director Jeff Zucker took over a year or two ago, CNN gave non-stop preferential coverage to whatever the sob-in-office was doing while on 2016 primary elections, campaign events etc took place. He and GOP were always given access to CNN tvtime compared to most Democratic candidates.

>Heck, they even made it look like Trump feeding Koi fish just tossed in the feed like he
>didn't give a fuck. When actually, the Japanese President(Shinzo Abe) had also tossed in
>his box of food.

Although Japan PM Abe did shake the feed box a bit to allow more food to go in pond instead of using a scoop, Abe probably didn't pour the entire content into the pond unlike you know who. I saw the photos and complete video so not to be fooled for a "gotcha" moment.

>But you couldn't see that due to the extreme close-up of Trump.

Besides feeding the Koi fish in the pond....did you see the so-called US leaders pants and how he had them on. He had them on backwards [wearing them backwards] as others had pointed out. Supposedly to make so-called US leader's waistline slim. Not fooling anyone and even Abe's wife was smiling [trying not to laugh directly at you-know-who]. Wearing pants backwards in a vanity-like vain attempt to fool people that he isn't fat when his waist is fat along with his fat head. Absolute jackass.

>But no. CNN isn't propaganda.

CNN chief/director Jeff Zucker is trying to move it closer to Fox propaganda style or ie: Fox-lite Now if Ted Turner still owned CNN and the cable channels he used to own before selling to Time-Warner, one can then be upset with CNN. I prefer news reporting to tell it as it is and Fox and Breitbart are way off from that. I have to watch BBC or CBC news these days to get the real news since US tv media is owned by corporations not willing to inform US citizens like it used to be done.