|
|
Re: I just don't see, scientifically, how a carbon tax will make the sun less active....
12/13/16 11:55 PM
|
|
|
My understanding is that while you might be right that technically we won't destroy the earth short of nuclear weapons, that's a dangerous line to cling to because we can still make it uninhabitable for humans. So it could (and probably eventually will because we are so stupid) get to the point of wiping out humans, then the earth would heal itself without us over the next million years and become inhabitable again. It's already getting up to 126 degrees in spots in the middle east, they say being outside in it feels like your lungs are on fire. Parts of north Africa are supposedly soon to be uninhabitable by humans.
Either way you can't really believe that you're smarter and more insightful than 97% of scientists and your looking-back theory doesn't hold any water. I mean keep going another 100 years and drill holes in heads, and by that train of thought you might as well never believe anything at all. We really are in the post-truth era. 2000-2015 was the information age. 2016-? post-truth. Also the climate changes are unfolding exactly how it was predicted by scientists in the 1980s, and when they said it would happen. So maybe they know what they are talking about more than the Breitbart nihilist trolls and Alex Jones.
|
|
Index 
Flat 
Re: I just don't see, scientifically, how a carbon tax will make the sun less active....
Reply
