> > Can you clarify one thing? You mention SDL behaving a given way with
> > -nounevenstretch. Can you get me a screenshot of what the result would look like if
> > you specified a resolution that wasn't an integer multiple of either the width or
> the
> > height?
>
> Only low resolution available in my laptop is 320x240. So I've chosen Golden Axe
> which is 320x224.
>
> sdlmame64 goldnaxe -resolution 320x240 -switchres -nokeepaspect -nofilter
> -nounevenstretch
>
> Notice MAME removes the borders when taking a snapshot with F12, so the resulting
> .png is 320x224. But I swear there are two nice black borders on my screen (obviously
> this resolution looks like crap on an LCD with all its internal scaling going on, but
> it's cristal clear on a CRT).
Does it look any different if you don't specify -nounevenstretch? If so, how?
|
Index 
Flat 
Re: I'm beginning to understand users' frustration with video options
Reply
Re: I'm beginning to understand users' frustration with video options
