|
|
Re: Identity-stealing sockpuppet troll finally crosses line, gets just desserts
09/13/15 12:25 PM
|
|
|
> > I think there absolutely SHOULD be limitations put on freedom of speech.
>
> Well thank fuck there aren't any jackbooted thugs like you in power in the USA yet,
> at least not yet, you fascist piece of shit. Nobody needs freedom of speech to
> protect speech we like, the whole point of it is to protect speech that we may find
> vile, crude, or utterly morally reprehensible. The solution to speech is more speech
> condemning those that state views we find reprehensible, not stifling it and
> pretending that it doesn't exist. I might disagree with the fact that you're nothing
> more than a stereotypical conservative mouthpiece who hates brown people, but I
> wouldn't in a million years suggest that there should be legislation preventing you
> from espousing your racist, neanderthal-class views.
>
> Better yet, if you want to ban speech that you don't like, why don't you move to
> Saudia Arabia? I'm sure you'd fit right in there. You're a hell of a lot closer in
> ideology to the Muslims you whine about than any Christian out there. Fat lot of
> "loving thy neighbor" you're doing.
This. The logical conclusion of banning anti-Americanism (or anti-Australianism or whatever) is DPKR: enforced patriotism/personality cult where you get persecuted for saying anything negative about the state or its leaders. That's what the West was supposed to be keeping us free from. But the West seems to have lost its way.
|
|
Previous 
Index 
Next 
Flat 
Re: Identity-stealing sockpuppet troll finally crosses line, gets just desserts
Reply
