Frontend Tech + >> MAMEUI & IV/Play
View all threads Index   Flat Mode Flat  

Napalmhardcore
MAME Fan
Reged: 03/03/15
Posts: 5
Send PM
Is IV/Play a replacement for MAMEUI 32?
03/03/15 10:00 PM


I am really sorry if I am being stupid but I'm currently just going around in circles.

I have recently been given a second hand laptop (64-bit). One of the first things I wanted to do was put MAME on it, so I went to http://www.mameui.info/ I also thought it would be a good idea to grab the latest version of MAME for my 32-bit desktop. I've not tried the 64-bit version yet but all the files and folders I expect are there, however the 32-bit version does not appear to be on the site. Only IV/Play, source files and update files are there.

I have visited EasyEmu and the MAME FAQ but both lead me back to http://www.mameui.info/ for MAMEUI 32. I've also tried searching the forums, but phrasing a search for appropriate information is not easy.

Many of the topics and discussions I've seen whilst searching have been way above my head, so please go easy on me. I know nothing about compiling etc, I just want the latest stable version of MAMEUI 32 or its equivalent.

Your help would be much appreciated.







Entire thread
Subject Posted by Posted on
* Is IV/Play a replacement for MAMEUI 32? Napalmhardcore 03/03/15 10:00 PM
. * Re: Is IV/Play a replacement for MAMEUI 32? StilettoAdministrator  03/04/15 01:15 AM
. * Re: Is IV/Play a replacement for MAMEUI 32? Napalmhardcore  03/04/15 07:27 AM
. * Re: Is IV/Play a replacement for MAMEUI 32? RobbbertModerator  03/04/15 09:00 AM
. * Re: Is IV/Play a replacement for MAMEUI 32? Napalmhardcore  03/04/15 09:53 AM
. * Re: Is IV/Play a replacement for MAMEUI 32? RobbbertModerator  03/03/15 10:13 PM
. * Re: Is IV/Play a replacement for MAMEUI 32? Napalmhardcore  03/03/15 10:16 PM

Extra information Permissions
Moderator:  John IV, Robbbert 
0 registered and 85 anonymous users are browsing this forum.
You cannot start new topics
You cannot reply to topics
HTML is enabled
UBBCode is enabled
Thread views: 3724