> > You're not wrong. DD1/2 and Rygar are among the games where the NES port played > better than the arcade. > > > Double Dragon just had the hardware slow-down issue. DD2 didn't have that, and there > were more and cooler moves (because ultimately the elbow move, lackluster though it > was, in DD was the only decent move). I don't recall anything being wrong with it. > > Still, Double Dragon was fun enough. I was in high school when it was released, and I > had not been keeping up with video games, so it was my first experience with the > type. > > ((I mean, I was imagining translucent images in a transparent screen (the windshield > of my Matchbox '70 crimson red, white-top Challenger) at perhaps nine or ten - this > was before Star Trek II, even - so arcade games only somewhat got my attention. I > wanted 3D back then. Ironic my current sentiments about that, and 2D games, > respectively.)) > > Rygar was just a crappy game. Black Tiger was the mature version of the period, and > rightly so, it was a Capcom game.
I hate, hate, hate the left/right attack scheme of DD2. It's so counterintuitive. And the less the said about DD3, the better.
|