> Not really. You made accusations against Americans. I pointed out that you did that.
I gave you possible reasons why Americans might find themselves thinking they were victimised. One of them is that you're imagining it, the other were reasons why you deserve it. I'm not sure which is true, although your reaction is giving me some insight.
> Because if they aren't, you're just saying you like to attack both Americans and > Koreans, when you previously claimed that people said these things about their own > countries.
I haven't said I like attacking people. If people deserve derision or criticism then it doesn't matter what country they are from.
> I'm just looking for the balance you said exists, > and you're the one that inserted > obscure American laws into a discussion of an ad that has no bearing on them.
The ad was shown at the super bowl, the uniforms were at the super bowl. The ad was criticised for being anti-patriotic, using the flag on a uniform is illegal because it's anti-patriotic. The article was written by a US citizen. How is that not balanced?