> > If I'm correct > > in all that, then the solution is for Haze to grant permission for his code to be > > relicensed, but transfer responsibility for the actual implementation of this to > > other developers in such a way that they alone would risk legal repercussions if it > > wasn't done correctly. > > If _what_ wasn't done correctly? He can only grant permission for code to be > relicensed if he owns the copyright on it.
If the identification of copyright holders wasn't done correctly, plus the replacement of any code that isn't authorized for the new license. My interpretation of Haze's blog posts is that he believes it will be nearly impossible to do this right.
I'm not sure there's a lot more I can say on the subject given that (a) I'm not Haze and (b) his blog posts on the subject aren't even on-line anymore.
Previous 
Index 
Next 
Flat 
Re: Update
Reply
Re: and what's really sad
