>I'm pretty sure that Haze has said that any change Fair enough, but I think we can both agree that everything that guy says isn't exactly gospel. I have to assume that given the nature of MAME and how it's developed that such a case (99% attributable to one person) is the minority, that is ... a straw-man. If I'm way off base and most files are clearly attributable to single person than please set me straight.
>No we are only talking about identifying the copyright holder, you've completely missed the point. Are you putting forth that you can identify the copyright holder of a piece of code without first attributing it to someone? How do you do skip that step?