> in cases where he's made major modifications to code already in > MAME. If the code wasn't properly licensed to begin with, then he has no legal rights > to it.
I might be wrong, but from balrog's explanations of the legal aspects of the problem, if Haze has rewritten the code using the former version just for reference, then he has full right on the new code (even if it is nice to still give credit to the persons who did previous work)
Index 
Flat 
Re: Update
Reply
Re: and what's really sad
