> This surprises me as we were on course for getting majority support for mainly GPL > with partly BSD for the few files that make sense (chd etc) when you dropped the make > everything BSD bomb.
At that time you were firmly aligned with Haze's position and GPL was not possible in any way, so I agreed with the least-change-from-current path. You've since come around to a saner position, and if you can get everyone to agree to a BSD/GPL split I'm all for it.