> My point is that it's *not* changing, we're just adding tags to source files to > better document the origin and potential for non-MAME use of the files. This doesn't > help people wanting to use the project as a whole, but it does start to crack the > door open a little bit towards MAME being less arrogant and more of a true open > source project.
A few posts back it sounded like ALL the source files would be MAME+BSD, so it's easy to get confused. Keeping the files that go way back as MAME license only and making newer files where authors and contributors can be identified MAME+BSD sounds perfectly fine legally!