> Zimmerman is Hispanic. So calling him "white" when you know better is on you (not you
> you, them you), not someone else. Oh wait, is my calling him that when he looks sort
> of white racist? No, I haven't actually seen him, and am going by his
> self-identification.
>
His dad is of European descent and his mother is Peruvian, though if I had to guess from his appearance, I wouldn't call him white.
> I don't know anything about any recent Tea Party activity, but they're generally
> against something the government is doing, not something having to do with a
> race-identified group.
>
The point was that were people at Tea Party rallies who seemed to be against a race-identified group. How to reach out to those who use race as a divisive issue where it's not even relevant?
Those were some of the results of a google image search for "racist tea party signs". I have no evidence that these were actually held by people who support the tea party movement or were taken at tea party rallies, I'm just *assuming* they are valid. If I recall correctly, Gat thought the tea party movement was a fantastic idea and supported their rallies. I doubt he would support anyone referring to Zimmerman or his own children as half-breeds.
> Why is their activity being held in contrast to rallies organized by someone who has
> long ago been identified as a race-baiting community agitator? Or are there some not
> being run by Jackson, Sharpton, and their properties?
Again, Gat thought the tea party=awesome, occupy wall street=affront to everything 'Murica, and justice for trayvon=racists. However, what he thought was awesome had some racists, and what he thinks is racist probably has people that just want justice for Caylee Trayvon. Maybe I'm wrong, maybe the people organizing the rallies could care less about the grieving parents who think their child was murdered and only want to create divisiveness. I hope I'm not wrong, that's stupid.
Oh for Pete's sake.
loser.com
|
Index 
Flat 
Re: New poll
Reply
