|
|
Re: no more bang bang < 18
03/09/13 02:25 AM
|
|
|
> Reminds me of a Reno 911 episode where the police dept. advertised age of consent
> wallet cards that had them all per state. On Wiki P there is:
I'm too old to bang teenagers, married, etc. but out of interest, how does this interact with "universal jurisdiction" that often gets claimed on child sex offences? If you screw a 16-year-old then later move to a state where age of consent is 18, are they likely to try and invoke "universal jurisdiction" to charge you for it? I know it happens internationally - if an Australian goes to Indonesia (where age of consent is 14 for girls and 16 for guys) and has sex with a 15-year-old girl, they can still be charged with a sex crime on returning to Australia (where age of consent is 16 for everyone) because they claim "universal jurisdiction".
|
|
Index 
Flat 
Re: no more bang bang < 18
Reply
no more bang bang < 18
