> Securing firearms with a safe that actually works for the purpose, rather than, say, > a glass-fronted wooden case with a lock, would be an obvious move for anyone who had > had training that isn't required or even offered by most states. The NRA offers that > training, by the way.
Most safes are rated in hours of attack. A determined person with time on his hands can get into Fort Knox.
People think of security as something that others will not try to work around. For example encryption. http://xkcd.com/538/
What would stop someone from bashing on someones toes with a hammer until they gave up the keys or combo?
There is no such thing as a 'safe gun'. Bottom line is we are allowed to have guns. Now it is just a matter of how well trained do we want everyone.