> Also on last Friday a second shooter was ABOUT to go on a massive rampage in a > shopping mall.... > > But unlike in the Connecticut case, there was no ban on guns in the area, so he was > stopped after only two shots fired by a citizen with a legal concealed handgun. > > A second massive killing spree averted. > > It happend on the exact same day! > > The contrast should have made national headlines... > > But there was no mention of the second shooter in the national news. No national > coverage. All but ignored. > > Why? Because an armed citizen saved the day? Because the LACK of a gun ban for > law-abiding citizens saved the day? Because it doesn't support the gun control > narrative? > > In Connecticut area 22 dead, most are children. > > In Oregon massive shooting spree averted thanks to a law-abiding concealed handgun > carrying citizen. > > The U.S. news is nothing but a political propaganda machine. They don't give a crap > about the news.
1) The mall shooting was last Tuesday and was pretty extensively covered, then became yesterday's news when 20 kindergartners were murdered. 2) The shooter killed 2 people, before killing himself. So there was a killing spree before his suicide, though not a massive one. 3) Does anyone actually have any evidence that the shooter saw Nick Meli hiding behind a pillar with a gun? He said himself he ran from the pillar to a nearby store, it's not like he stood there aiming at the shooter until the shooter committed suicide. Maybe the shooter really *did* kill himself because cops were closing in. Cops were running into the mall less than a minute after the call went over the air. It is possible this guy is just talking himself up because he wants to be a cop himself one day and really had nothing to do with the shooter stopping himself. If we are going to consider the national anti-gun media conspiracy angle, we also need to keep the false hero complex conspiracy angle in mind.
Index 
Flat 
Re: What the hell is wrong with the news?
Reply
