But unlike in the Connecticut case, there was no ban on guns in the area, so he was stopped after only two shots fired by a citizen with a legal concealed handgun.
A second massive killing spree averted.
It happened recently too!
The contrast should have made national headlines...
But there was no mention of the second shooter in the national news, and how he was stopped by a citizen with a legal handgun. No national coverage. All but ignored.
Why? Because an armed citizen saved the day? Because the LACK of a gun ban for law-abiding citizens saved the day? Because it doesn't support the gun control narrative?
In Connecticut area 22 dead, most are children.
In Oregon massive shooting spree averted after only two shots fired thanks to a law-abiding concealed handgun carrying citizen.
The U.S. news is nothing but a political propaganda machine. They don't give a crap about the news.
Index 
Flat 
What the hell is wrong with the news?
Reply
