> > In other words, you want revenge.
> >
> > Here's an idea: public torture. And let it be the victims' families who torture the
> > killers. How's that for revenge?
.....
> It sounds sick to do but it's the right thing.
I suppose that by "it", you mean "torture".
> The only effective way to teach people
> is t scare them. Scare them they wont do it.
I wonder: how effective? And can you make sure that they are all sufficiently scared? Would there be even, say, one person in 100,000 who would not be effectively scared by this, or who would simply be enraged?
> It's how I've seen life.
Scaring people, or being scared? Or seeing others being scared? Or all three? Wait, I'm not sure I really want to know.
>
> And I think wanting revenge is fair enough, aslong as it's not lethal, why spill more
> blood.
Yes, why spill it? When there are so many people who need blood donations, spilling blood is just a waste...
I should never have gotten into this discussion.
Which is greater: the combined life expectancy of the victims before the shooter did his thing, or the total amount of time people have spent discussing it and thinking about it? It's not like any of this is going to bring the dead people back to life!
I'm going to see if I can terminate my account now...
(I am not joking about terminating my account)
|
Index 
Flat 
Re: What the hell is wrong with some people?
Reply
