> It seems like Hostess has been teetering on the brink for a while now and this strike > was just the straw that broke the camel's back. I'd be curious to know what the > union's rationale was, though. I would think "no job" over "crappy job" would be a > tough sell to the membership. > > Also, how is it that Hostess was hurting? I thought Americans were fatter than ever?
Maybe 99 weeks of unemployment at a higher level instead of 10% off then getting laid off later anyway?
|