RECLAIMING MY TIME, MOTHERFUCKER

Entrance | Main Index | Search | New user | Login | Who's Online | FAQ | Rules

The only golf Trump gets in prison is a black 1-wood >> Welcome to the War Room Previous   Index   Next   Flat

italie MAME owes italie many thank yous, hah Reged: 09/20/03 Posts: 15246 Loc: BoomTown Send PM Re: For the record 9/11 conspiracy theorist 08/15/12 05:34 AM Reply > Since you brought up the Pentagon, why is it do you think there aren't any other > released videos of the strike on the Pentagon other than the grainy, choppy gate > camera? Surely there are/were other cameras pointed at the Pentagon, either on the > grounds, or from other surrounding buildings? > > I'm not trying to trap you or go into theories, I just find it really strange that > there isn't any other footage of the attack on DC. > > If anything it would silence a lot of conspiracy theorists on the subject. I don't know. I can speak from experience that most of those gate cameras suck. They aren't very high frame rate, usually the same type you put in ATM machines. Why they don't release any of the other footage supposedly captured is anyone's guess. Maybe they didn't want the public knowing how shitty their surveillance really was. This is a good, and valid point to scrutinize. The lack of evidence doesn't make for proof of any other theory though. Again, I ~do~ know that AA lost a plane here as well and 64 people on it. They had boarding passes and physically accounted for luggage that was scanned and loaded onto the plane. If there was some grand conspiracy here, they would have had to hack into AA's systems. They would have had to insert false passenger manifests, false (yet valid) luggage tags, fake the scans of said luggage and boarding passes, steal TWO planes, and kidnap ~at least~ one living breathing flight attendant for the last 11 years. While doing all this, they'd have to convince a struggling airline industry to go along with a plot that would cripple their business further. Just doesn't sound very Occam.

Entire thread Subject Posted by Posted on For the record 9/11 conspiracy theorist italie 08/12/12 03:21 AM Re: For the record 9/11 conspiracy theorist twisty  08/14/12 04:04 AM Re: For the record 9/11 conspiracy theorist Tomu Breidah  08/14/12 03:50 PM Re: For the record 9/11 conspiracy theorist italie  08/15/12 03:16 AM Re: For the record 9/11 conspiracy theorist Tomu Breidah  08/16/12 12:16 AM Re: For the record 9/11 conspiracy theorist italie  08/16/12 06:04 AM Re: For the record 9/11 conspiracy theorist Tomu Breidah  08/16/12 01:04 AM Re: For the record 9/11 conspiracy theorist italie  08/16/12 06:36 AM sexiest engine humm on the planet... italie  08/16/12 06:55 AM Re: For the record 9/11 conspiracy theorist Gor  08/15/12 05:00 AM Re: For the record 9/11 conspiracy theorist Hizzout  08/15/12 05:00 AM Re: For the record 9/11 conspiracy theorist italie  08/15/12 05:34 AM Re: For the record 9/11 conspiracy theorist Hizzout  08/15/12 05:41 AM Re: For the record 9/11 conspiracy theorist italie  08/15/12 06:03 AM Nope, not gonna work. italie  08/14/12 05:15 AM Re: Nope, not gonna work. Tomu Breidah  08/14/12 03:31 PM Re: For the record 9/11 conspiracy theorist Matty_  08/14/12 04:22 AM Re: For the record 9/11 conspiracy theorist Master O  08/12/12 08:49 PM Re: For the record 9/11 conspiracy theorist Tomu Breidah  08/12/12 10:42 AM Re: For the record 9/11 conspiracy theorist italie  08/12/12 02:19 PM Re: For the record 9/11 conspiracy theorist Tomu Breidah  08/12/12 05:53 PM Re: For the record 9/11 conspiracy theorist lharms  08/12/12 09:33 PM Re: For the record 9/11 conspiracy theorist Vas Crabb  08/13/12 12:45 PM Re: For the record 9/11 conspiracy theorist lharms  08/14/12 12:42 AM Re: For the record 9/11 conspiracy theorist italie  08/12/12 07:44 PM One more point, for the record. italie  08/12/12 08:10 PM Re: One more point, for the record. Tomu Breidah  08/13/12 05:11 AM Re: One more point, for the record. italie  08/13/12 06:18 AM Re: One more point, for the record. Tomu Breidah  08/13/12 08:27 AM Re: One more point, for the record. italie  08/13/12 01:51 PM Re: One more point, for the record. Tomu Breidah  08/13/12 04:37 PM Re: One more point, for the record. italie  08/13/12 06:56 PM Re: One more point, for the record. Tomu Breidah  08/13/12 11:37 PM Re: One more point, for the record. italie  08/14/12 02:53 AM Re: One more point, for the record. Tomu Breidah  08/14/12 03:29 PM Re: One more point, for the record. italie  08/15/12 02:34 AM Re: One more point, for the record. BIOS-D  08/14/12 10:51 AM Re: One more point, for the record. TriggerFin  08/14/12 03:05 PM Re: One more point, for the record. mesk  08/13/12 07:30 PM Gremlins. *nt* Foxhack  08/13/12 12:03 AM Re: For the record 9/11 conspiracy theorist Hizzout  08/12/12 04:35 PM Re: For the record 9/11 conspiracy theorist italie  08/12/12 05:26 PM Re: For the record 9/11 conspiracy theorist Hizzout  08/12/12 06:06 PM Re: For the record 9/11 conspiracy theorist lharms  08/12/12 08:26 PM Re: For the record 9/11 conspiracy theorist Hizzout  08/13/12 04:56 AM Re: For the record 9/11 conspiracy theorist lharms  08/14/12 01:22 AM Re: For the record 9/11 conspiracy theorist italie  08/12/12 08:35 PM Re: For the record 9/11 conspiracy theorist italie  08/12/12 07:55 PM Re: For the record 9/11 conspiracy theorist Hizzout  08/13/12 03:14 AM Re: For the record 9/11 conspiracy theorist italie  08/13/12 03:39 AM LOL Darth Mario  08/13/12 11:09 PM Re: LOL italie  08/14/12 02:31 AM but but but...I read it on the Internet! dfrance  08/12/12 04:33 AM I just read this on the internet too... italie  08/12/12 04:34 AM I'm actually a mason so cannot comment on the olypmpic logo... dfrance  08/12/12 04:44 AM Kinda like carving your name into fresh concrete, eh? italie  08/12/12 05:13 AM

Extra information Permissions Moderator:  Smitdogg  0 registered and 70 anonymous users are browsing this forum. You cannot start new topics You cannot reply to topics HTML is enabled UBBCode is enabled Thread views: 11230

Browser Test | Delete Cookies atom-guru atom-guru atom-guru atom-guru UBB.threads™ 6.3.2