MAMEWorld Forums - Welcome to the War Room - Re: One more point, for the record.

> This is the point at which I tune out, and certify you nuts. The term "False Flag"
> gets used as logical reasoning and as an end-all be-all discussion winner. It's
> endlessly frustrating that all the time and effort spent creating this huge
> conspiracy always gets wrapped up in such a let down of creativity.
>
> "Because False Flag" only says to me that you have no sound or logical explanation
> for why you hold your theories, other than you have more blind hatred toward the
> government than the people who flew the planes into the buildings.
>

It's not blind. I just now see what should be obvious. It used to be that anyone that would say that the U.S. gov. was responsible - of course I would think less of them, as if their opinion didn't matter since they were so 'out-there' and crazy. My thought was that they had no reason to say what they did, they were just doing it to be cool or something, anti-establishment hippies that hate 'The Man'. Did they then know the things that I know now? I don't know. I'd say that WTC Building 7 is what first opened my eyes (e.g. 'No longer blind'). Then the Pentagon.... One door would open to another. And no, I didn't like it. So any "hate" that I have (more like distrust) is based on a betrayal from something I once had a lot of faith in.

Since the U.S. government was responsible for (at least) 2 of the incidents I mentioned, and that they are on record officially -would mean that the U.S. is also capable of committing the atrocities of 9/11. I can understand if you want to cop-out and play the part of a denier. That is the easiest thing to do. I know it will only be a matter of time before you see the light too. Many other people have before, and I can't see why you should be an exception. Or am I justified in accusing you of being blind in your acceptance of the so called "official story"?

Actually, you were incorrect where you said...

It's the inconsistencies in the so called "official explanations" which lend to more logical explanations -a.k.a. "Conspiracy Theories" which must obviously be defined as anything that doesn't line up with what the Government says happened, which point to the Government being responsible. They claimed the attacks were orchestrated by "terrorists". So what better excuse would there be to invade foreign countries and bomb the crap out of 'em? Billion, Trillions? of our tax money funds these wars that, as Dick Cheney said;

"Will not end in our lifetime"

LEVEL-4