> Hey Knighty, You remind me of one OLDer member here... ...maybe I am wrong...
> ...maybe NOT...
It's a known fact he's actually OldSchoolGamer. The difference now is he's slowly learning from his past mistakes. For starters he's not frequently flooding the forums with Yahoo Answers type questions anymore.
Vas Crabb addressed it wrong, but what he says it's true. Software is made usually meeting programmer's necessities they think it could be useful for the rest. Consequently, there's not software it satisfies universal necessities.
My advice is: if the software you currently use satisfies your Internet habits, keep it like that. But if you need something else, trying another software (on a PC you can easily revert back) doesn't do any harm. Nothing wrong with asking for opinions though.
I'll keep using Firefox because even if it's a resource hogger, I can easily customize it to keep a low profile (ads, script and cookie blocking), I have a better manage for my tabs (I open a lot) and it's a popular browser I know it won't give me major problems when viewing pages optimized for other browsers. I'd try Chrome but I don't like to report everything to Google. I'd try Opera but I can't customize it as I want, plus it has the fame to be a good browser for consoles and a terrible browser for PCs. The choice is yours and it doesn't matter the opinions we give, you have to try them yourself to know if it really meets what you need.
Off topic but related, under that very same concept there's not a better emulator for the same reasons. So keep that in mind the next time you tell X emulator is better than Y.
|
Index 
Flat 
Re: Opera for Windows
Reply
