> > > > but he is a "de facto" "part" of the team since he IS contributing > > > > > > no the fact that he's contributing means only that he is an external contributor. > > > being part of the team also means discuss with the others and accept critics when > > you > > > do a mistake or when people disagree with you. > > > > Ah, ok. > > > > Good that the team is a group of people that discuss with the others and accept > > critics when they do a mistake or when people disagree with them. > > > > Keep it up team. > > for the record, Haze is not the only one who asked [1] to be removed from the list > because he was unable to interact fruitfully with the others. > > [1] and notice "asked", not "was asked"...
I am sure. I wasn't there to know what happened. Maybe he is an a**hole. Haze is not the point. The point is if this thing is any good.
BTW note (speaking as someone that has been part of teams and has led teams) that you correctly say "unable to interact fruitfully" - stress on word "interact" (which is a "both ways" word).