> You guys are hiliarious. If other people from other forums read this thread, they are > going to be laughing their butts off that some of you are actually trying to say MESS > is better than those emulators for those systems. It's really comical and pathetic at > the same time. The case is OVERWHELMINGLY in favor of the emulators I suggested... > hands down.
Nope... I haven't made one statement yet saying that MESS is better.
I'm asking YOU to explain how the other emulators are better. I genuinely want to know.
So far, all you've said is "they're better because they're better. I see no data, facts, playtesting, etc. to backup your point.
For example, compatibility. How many games for each console are there that MESS can't play, that the others can?
Or accuracy. Show me some side-by-side testing between Magic Engine, MESS, and a real PC Engine that proves Magic Engine is better; that David Michel's work is better than Charles MacDonald's work.
List me some glitches games have in MESS that the other emulators don't have.
RELAX and just have fun. Remember, it's all about the games.
Index 
Flat 
Re: Probably a good time to see how far MESS has progressed
Reply
