> I always wondered, what is the point of building a "monolithic" exe and not have some > of (or all) the main modules as separate dll in a subfolder? > Would possibly greatly help with end-user updates as possibly only SOME of the DLL > change. Or indeed help with making almost what you ask... If asomeone has only some > of the dll, he will be able to use MAME but with reduced functionality (eg. no > "mechanical.dll" - although I am not saying I know what kind of dll "split" should be > done, I am just giving an example).
Google the term "DLL Hell".
|