> > I'm debating whether Rush is worth $160 for decent seats, but leaning towards not > > worth it. > > $160 would be a reasonable price... for four seats. For one, though? No thanks. >
That was my thinking. I believe I paid around $30 to see them 10 years ago.
> > I finished in the top third in both the overall results and the fat boy division > > (190lbs+). I was beaten > > by a 6 year old, a 7 year old, and two 8 year olds. > > 8-year-olds over 190 lbs?
The youngest signed up in the fat boy division was 17. I'm surprised any signed up for the fat chick division (150lbs+), but there were 50 of them. It probably helped that it wasn't actually referred to as fat boy/fat chick.
Oh for Pete's sake.
loser.com
|