> Honestly, maybe it's time to just take a step back and assess the existing state of
> things. Not going to tell you guys what to do here, but I'm pretty sure an assessment
> wouldn't hurt-- the old code running here can't be left as-is forever for obvious
> security reasons.
But that could be said about the next software we move to, and the software after that.
> It might even hit the point where a clean-break transition is REQUIRED, losing a lot
> of existing history. Better to have some idea of how to save what you have before
> you're forced to lose it.
Right now we get less hassle than any other message board I've ever seen because of the tweaks twisty has done. Absolutely no problems whatsoever aside from people wanting mobile device hookups.
> If it's going to take donations for the time and effort, and for the cost of the
> software, I'm pretty sure the community will step forward to do so. I'd be first in
> line, though I don't have a lot to offer therein.
Roc already took more than enough donations to pay for a new board software. I see no point in taking more away from more important issues (dumping) unless it's for hosting fees, which should also already be covered for a few more months at least.
|
Index 
Flat 
Re: Can Tapatalk Support be added to MAMEWORLD?
Reply
Re: Can Tapatalk Support be added to MAMEWORLD?
