>> BTW, I'd be happy if we could get rid of the "alternate" sets and use "set n" instead ... > Well, as we see from this thread, some people are mistaking "set n" for version/revision numbers... this is probably one of those things that will be hard to get the point across no matter what phrasing is picked... if it wouldn't make waves, I'd nominate "alternate set n" as being a little clearer.
Honestly, I don't see where people should have problems with the "set n" description : IIRC, such "convention" exists since MAME begining 15 years ago ...
And IMO, "alternate set 1" would be hard to explain ...
Steph from The Ultimate Patchers
|