Quote: > Back here in real life, I was implying that later version numbers of software are > generally improved compared to earlier ones.
No you didn't. You implied that the previous MAME versions were inferior and could threaten your reputation when adopted through other channels. Like Android ports.
I can understand that, but it implied embarrassment on your part. Then you go off and make that reply.
Windows 1.0 and Windows 7? Another gem from Mr. Belmont.
What would be more apt? OS2 and NT3x? Secret Society for Windows 1.0? A Gem (sic) conspiracy, no doubt.
We never left real life Mr. Belmont. I would instead feel proud to be working on such a project that is challenging and suited to all programming talents. I'm sure that is what you meant.
Your reputation is at peril because of an earlier work, which you base your future and improved work on. Due to its availability on several mass produced platforms.
Index 
Flat 
Re: Interesting Statement
Reply
Re: Interesting Statement
