> > Republic = Representative Government = Bigger centralized government, a necessary > > evil for a time when 'one man, one vote' was logistically impossible. > > > > Democracy = One man, one vote, almost no central government (maybe a prime-minister > > of some sort, and a small senatorial body to deal with day-to-day things) > > Well, at the risk of seeming "contrary", Social Science characterizes them as: > > Republic: Representative government ruled by laws. > Democracy: Majority rules. > > Our founding fathers purposefully made us a Republic, a representative nation of > laws, to prevent the "mob effect" of a pure democracy. No where is the word > "democratic" in our Declaration of Independence, Constitution, Bill of Rights, nor > any Constitution of the 50 states. > > Perfect example of the mob-effect of Democracy is a lynch mob. They capture their > target, vote to hang him... 35 yays (the mob) to 1 nay (the guy they caught)... and > he's hung on the spot. > > Under a nation ruled by laws and representation, not majority vote, he is entitled to > a trial by law first. > > Quite honestly, we've shifted closer and closer to a democracy, and all of it's > trappings... the most glaring example is our tax laws... 9 to 1 vote to take the > money from the 1. Under a rule of law, the tax code would equally distribute the tax > burden... usually referred to as a "flat tax", where one tax rate is applicable to > all Americans without prejudice or favoritism. > > > Awesome video... please watch it.
That is a great video, and yes, I was being rather generalized in my definitions. I can't agree more on the flat tax idea, but with so many politicians being in the pockets of big business (remember 'Corporations are people too') it's not going to happen without a complete turnover of all incumbents, and then it'll just be a matter of time before the game starts again.
Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
|