> something i've never bothered to research...
>
> fact: the hubble telescope cannot (because of distance resolution) photograph the
> landing site.
Hubble was meant to look at stars, so yeah. It isn't a spy sat.
> yet, we left something reflective on the moon surface that we are capable of
> accurately bouncing light off of, even while the moon is busy hauling ass in orbit?
> also, isn't the moon itself reflective enough to use for this purpose?
Lasers, diffraction.
Not that I bothered doing any research either.
|
Index 
Flat 
Re: I wonder what else we left up there
Reply
