> I'll give you most of that... > > > 'Superhuman' is an irrelevant term; > > "Superhuman" means above what a human can achieve. In this context, it means > "exceeding human-level intelligence." The article used a series of words, > "smarter-than-human intelligence," when there is this single word which means that.
Not to great a nec....
Now. I don't even consider myself 'human'. But let's put that aside. The point of import here is that there is use of static (and species-centric) terms to imbue something with definition. 'Singularity' has nothing to do with consciousness, but instead capacity.
Consider it high comedy....sincere tragedy....whatever...don't take it personally.
The Culture
|