> If you would try reading the Constitution instead of wiping your ass with it, you > might learn that you don't have the authority to declare an existing law > unconstitutional, in whole or in part. > > Regardless of any thoughts about the actual law (Defense of Marriage Act). > > ...Wait, does that mean he thinks parts of it aren't good enough to use as toilet > paper...?
The question of import, as always, is: is the law functional? Proceed from there.
Consider it high comedy....sincere tragedy....whatever...don't take it personally.
The Culture
|