> > IMO T11 should be a subclass of PDP11, be better if a PDP11 core is created and
> once
> > that's matured enough, add(merge) T11 to it.
> >
> > http://www.village.org/pdp11/faq.html
> > huge timegap between the two
> > PDP-11: 1970
> > T-11: early 80s
> >
>
> So the PDP-11 is an earlier version of the T-11 but has 14 MORE OPcodes? You'd think
> it would be the other way around or does the T-11 have a bunch of other codes that
> the PDC-11 doesn't?
I believe this is entirely correct, and I'm not particularly surprised by it. While the T-11 may have been much later, it was also considerably cheaper than a minicomputer.
|
Index 
Flat 
Re: CPU subclassing for fun and profit
Reply
