|
Moose |
|
Don't make me assume my ultimate form!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reged: 05/03/04
|
|
Posts: 1483
|
|
Loc: Outback, Australia
|
|
|
|
Send PM
|
|
Re: Analog emulation
02/06/10 05:17 AM
|
|
|
> > It's all about solving differential equations. Does Runge-Kutta mean anything to
> you?
> > If it doesn't, you probably need to study some more.
If you need help, I might be able to offer some. Back in my last year of my Mathematics degree (~23 years ago), I developed my own predictor-corrector method for solving differential equations in much the same way that Runge-Kutta, Milne-Simpson, etc do, and then wrote Fortran and Pascal programs to test the hell out of it and compare the results against 6 or so other methods. Alas, like I say, this was 23 years ago, so I am now very rusty. But, if you need help solving any differential equations, let me know and I will do my best.
Oh, one thing: if you need accurate results, don't rely on Runge-Kutta, Milne-Simpson, or any of the other common methods like these, they tend produce terribly inaccurate results. (My 100+ test equations years ago proved this).
Moose
Edited by Moose (02/06/10 05:20 AM)
|
|
Index 
Flat 
Re: Analog emulation
Reply
Re: Analog emulation
