> There are hundreds of examples of this across arcade and home systems.
yep, just trying to get the conversation going. =)
> change. A lot of the most lasting memories of games we have are of the bits that
> stood out, sometimes these were the most frustrating bits, or bits that required
> additional learning, however there seems to be a lot of demand to smooth such parts
> out.
agreed! battletoads speed bike...
> For your example, I'm not even sure I'd consider the CGI art of the sequel to be
> better, it just seems lazy, visually the game loses something even before you
> consider the gameplay.
right, it's just apparent that more collaboration & technology were required to produce the sequels visuals.
i learned everything i know from KC
|
Previous 
Index 
Next 
Flat 
Re: when the technologically superior sequel is clearly inferior.
Reply
