> question is what size you're talking about...the raw one? The compressed one? What > data is captured, how it will be encoded...in which container it will be put > to...what the compression of the container will be...
If that's the size of a raw one, it still seems too small to me. I figure compression will not lower the size that much because of the uh... analog noise? That example photo seemed to have a bit of noise, even in the cleaned up image.
I don't know how the signal is being stored digitally, so I'm probably wrong.