> But why is some antiquated nonsense in a church the only form of commitment...
Did I mention a church?
> If I ever tell a girl I want to be together for life, if > she doesn't believe me and wants it in legal marriage writing etc. I would probably > be very offended.
I totally get that. I personally would equate a "life-bond" and marriage as one in the same, "legally" registered or no.
> You're basically saying nobody can have a fully committed relationship without a church
Where does this church reference keep coming from?
> What do you get though, that you couldn't get?
Heh. See my opening statement [If you are asking “whats in it for me” then, imho, you’re not ready for it.]
> What does the wedding change?
It's just a public ceremony to openly acknowledge the relationship. It is clearly important to people. That's why the LGBT community fights for this right too. You don't have to be public about it, but you should have the right to if the couple so chooses.
> Well speaking of kids, if you're planning to have kids with someone, the whole world > changes at that point, all my ideas and arguments would change. You can fuck kids up > for life if the parents split up before they are, I dunno maybe 18.
Agreed. Especially if the two people are hateful and spiteful. Suppoosedly they loved each other.. what happened? Life, I guess. There are no right answers. No wrong answers. Just answers, and the outcomes that follow, good or bad.
|